Assessment Of Into The Wild Essay Research free essay sample

Appraisal Of Into The Wild Essay, Research Paper Although exactly on mark in his appraisal of Chris McCandless being # 8220 ; in touch with the bare-bones kernel of nature # 8221 ; , Gordon Young # 8217 ; s predating description of Chris should be rephrased: A deeply Un-american figure, uncompromising in his attack and exhaustively optimistic about the hereafter. For Chris McCandless did non set out to demo or turn out his American character. Neither does he O.K. or desire to represent a true modern American character, because true American character does non seek purdah, preferring # 8220 ; the saddle to the tram # 8221 ; , or # 8220 ; the star-sprinkled sky to a roof # 8221 ; , or, particularly, # 8220 ; the obscure and hard trail, taking into the unknown, to any paved main road and the deep topographic point of the natural state to the discontent bred by metropoliss # 8221 ; , as provinces Everett Ruess. In fact, in today # 8217 ; s universe of ceaseless amenitiess and comfortss, nature and # 8220 ; acquiring off # 8 221 ; means puting up a collapsible shelter in the backyard, or driving our Recreational vehicle to a campsite, stop uping in the heat, the telecasting, and the cell phone and imbibing a beer. We will write a custom essay sample on Assessment Of Into The Wild Essay Research or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Yes, Chris McCandless exemplified what it is to be unconventional, nontraditional, nature-loving. What # 8217 ; s more of import, Chris showed us a peculiar grade of freedom, what true autonomy is about # 8211 ; the freedom non merely of the person, but the freedom of something much higher than that # 8211 ; the freedom of the head. Freedom from social restraints of ever holding to be person, playing some function. More than anyone, so far, Chris has shown me a true individuality, for in a topographic point where 1 is entirely for stat mis about, a topographic point where endurance is an hourly undertaking, where the lone milieus are the wild life, where one is surrounded by changeless self-contradictory issues ( beauty and danger, life of nature and decease in nature, physical restraints such as hungriness and complete freedom of the mind and head ) , a topographic point where the lone comrades are Leo Tolstoy, Henry David Thoreau, and Jack London, themselves unimposed persons wi th a capacity to love nature and a desire to be free # 8211 ; if in such a topographic point a adult male can non be merely a adult male, his ain ego # 8211 ; there will neer be such a topographic point and clip of individualism. If one can non happen an individuality # 8211 ; his true ego # 8211 ; here, he will neer happen it. It is an interesting construct, nature and freedom. For nature allows us to get away from our clip # 8211 ; our societal-imposed agenda, our clip clock and switch to nature # 8217 ; s clock # 8211 ; an interesting construct, for, if anything, it restricts us in many differ ent ways: sundown signifies sleep and cold, rain shows us ineluctable wetness and wretchedness, and morning is a clip of rousing. Therefore, in some ways, it is a limitation. Spiritually, nevertheless, it is a freedom through connexion with nature–going at nature’s gait, at a NATURAL gait, non at our ain artificially-created, societal-imposed gait. Nature besides signifies another kind of rational freedom: the freedom to be yourself, the freedom from holding to play a function. And in this manner, nature is an ultimate trial: without the cell phones and guns, the air conditioning and gasoline-powered comfortss, the individually-wrapped Twinkie bars and packaged H2O, are we strong plenty ourselves to last within the nature without all these comfortss we # 8217 ; ve created for ourselves? It is a trial of worthiness of our being on this planet, worthiness of claiming ourselves as a portion of nature. Chris showed us, and the nature, that some of us are at least strong plenty to try such an being, to undergo such test: he tried turn outing to the nature that we, as people, are worthy of such a claim. Chris, nevertheless, did non set out to turn out anything to nature, or truly, to anyone. Chris # 8217 ; journey was a religious one, and a selfish one ( so selfish, in fact, that he did non care about the consequence of his actions on others, such as his household ) . Chris did non raise pledges and donate that to charity ( although he did give away his ownerships and nest eggs in an attempt to free himself of # 8220 ; superficial luggage # 8221 ; . Nor did he publicise what he had set out to make. Chris # 8217 ; journey was a personal campaign of a hunt for inner and outer purdah, of life off the land, of fring ego of that which hinders us from being ourselves. His was a hunt of what life is about, and I greatly admire his personality, his mind, and his strength in holding done what he did. I admire his pursuit for cognition, his seeking ain individuality, and what he might happen ( every bit good as, to a certain grade his naivete and stupidity, although this is what killed hi m, yet both of these are what kept him on this pursuit. The stating # 8220 ; God watches out for saps and rummies # 8221 ; is true in Chris # 8217 ; instance # 8211 ; God kept him safe for a long clip so that Chris could detect what he discovered for himself ) . No, Chris surely does non stand for an American character in today # 8217 ; s society # 8211 ; he represents and can be associated with person from the great tradition of American literature, from Huck Finn to Jack London and from Thoreau to Ernest Hemingway.